Exploration of clinical and ethical issues in an expanded newborn metabolic screening programme: a qualitative interview study of healthcare professionals in Hong Kong.

INTRODUCTION: The Newborn Screening Programme for Inborn Errors of Metabolism (NBSIEM) enables early intervention and prevents premature mortality. Residual dried bloodspots (rDBS) from the heel prick test are a valuable resource for research. However, there is minimal data regarding how stakeholders in Hong Kong view the retention and secondary use of rDBS. This study aimed to explore views of the NBSIEM and the factors associated with retention and secondary use of rDBS among healthcare professionals in Hong Kong. METHODS: Between August 2021 and January 2022, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 healthcare professionals in obstetrics, paediatrics, and chemical pathology. Key themes were identified through thematic analysis, including views towards the current NBSIEM and the retention and secondary use of rDBS. RESULTS: After implementation of the NBSIEM, participants observed fewer patients with acute decompensation due to undiagnosed inborn errors of metabolism. The most frequently cited clinical utilities were early detection and improved health outcomes. Barriers to rDBS storage and its secondary use included uncertain value and benefits, trust concerns, and consent issues. CONCLUSION: This study highlighted healthcare professionals' concerns about the NBSIEM and uncertainties regarding the handling or utilisation of rDBS. Policymakers should consider these concerns when establishing new guidelines.

Sequencing projects will screen 200,000 newborns for disease.

U.K. and New York City efforts face cost and ethical issues.

The future of newborn screening for lysosomal disorders.

The goal of newborn screening is to enhance the outcome of individuals with serious, treatable disorders through early, pre-symptomatic detection. The lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) comprise a group of more than 50 diseases with a combined frequency of approximately 1:7000. With the availability of existing and new enzyme replacement therapies, small molecule treatments and gene therapies, there is increasing interest in screening newborns for LSDs with the goal of reducing disease-related morbidity and mortality through early detection. Novel screening methods are being developed, including efforts to enhance accuracy of screening using an array of multi-tiered, genomic, statistical, and bioinformatic approaches. While NBS data for Gaucher disease, Fabry disease, Krabbe disease, MPS I, and Pompe disease has demonstrated the feasibility of widespread screening, it has also highlighted some of the complexities of screening for LSDs. These include the identification of infants with later-onset, untreatable, and uncertain phenotypes, raising interesting ethical concerns that should be addressed as part of the NBS implementation process. Taken together, these efforts will provide critical, detailed data to help guide objective, ethically sensitive decision-making about NBS for LSDs.

[Half a century of newborn screening in Spain: Evolution of ethical, legal and social issues (ELSIs). Part III, social issues.] / Medio siglo de cribado neonatal en España: evolución de los aspectos éticos, legales y sociales (AELS). Parte III, aspectos sociales.

Decision making for the development of newborn screening programs is based on not only medical but also social concerns and involves different stakeholders. Part III of the article focuses on their role in the governance of the programs. First of all, we consider the proactive role that health authorities has played in the evolution to an evidentiary model of policy development currently based on evidence, just as in the preparation of an expert, impartial and transparent opinion on health policy and its coordination with the national health system. And, in accordance with this evidence and with the consensus, health autorities following quality criteria have made an attempt to achieve a more homogeneous approach of the neonatal screening program throughout the territory. Secondly, we address the role of several scientific and professional societies in newborn screening. Among them, it deserves to be mentioned the Spanish Society for Clinical Chemistry, currently Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQCML), and its Commission of inborn errors of metabolism and the Spanish Society for Newborn Screening (AECNE), which since 1985 and for thirty three years collected the activity of newborn screening centers and established a forum for debate, sharing of knowledge and cooperation among screening centers and with health authorities. Since 1999, the Spanish Society for Inborn Errors of Metabolism (AECOM) exercises an important activity in the field of diagnosis treatment and follow up of patients. Finally, we consider the role of families and the psychosocial aspects of the programme, and the associative activity of patient organizations. In 1990 the Spanish federation of PKU and other disorders (FAEPKU) was found, renamed currently as The Spanish Federation of Inherited Metabolic Diseases; together with the Spanish Federation for Rare Diseases (FEDER), found in 1999, they both have clearly contributed to the patient's empowerment, supporting research and education and establishing a network of cooperation and support for patients and their families. Patient organizations collaborate with health authorities but they have not participated in policy decision making yet. During this half century, the evolution of newborn screening programs have been characterized for a spirit of improvement, by including the development of ethical, legal and social issues. Important technological challenges lie ahead and it will be necessary to know how to use them efficiently, proportionally and fairly in the best interest of newborns and by extension of their family and society.

Las bases para la toma de decisiones acerca del desarrollo de los programas de cribado de Salud Pública no son exclusivamente médicas, sino también sociales. En esta parte III del artículo se contemplan los actores que intervienen en la gobernanza de los programas, cómo son las autoridades sanitarias, las sociedades científicas y profesionales, así como las familias y su movimiento asociativo. En primer lugar, se analiza el papel de las instituciones/autoridades sanitarias en el desarrollo de los programas y en la evolución del modelo para la toma de decisiones, hasta el actual basado en la evidencia, así como en la elaboración de una opinión experta, imparcial y transparente en política sanitaria y su coordinación en el marco del Sistema Nacional de Salud (SNS). Y, de acuerdo con dicha evidencia y con el consenso, las instituciones/autoridades sanitarias han tratado de conseguir un abordaje más homogéneo y conforme a criterios de calidad del programa de cribado neonatal en todo el territorio. A continuación, se aborda el papel de las sociedades científicas y profesionales, especialmente de la Sociedad Española de Química Clínica (actualmente Sociedad Española de Medicina de Laboratorio (SEQCML), a través de la Comisión de Errores Congénitos del Metabolismo, y de la Asociación Española de Cribado Neonatal (AECNE), que desde 1985 y durante 33 años recogieron los datos de actividad de los centros de cribado y establecieron un foro de debate, intercambio de conocimientos y colaboración entre ellos y con las autoridades sanitarias. De ellas, destaca el importante papel de la Asociación Española de Errores Congénitos del Metabolismo (AECOM) desde 1999 en el diagnóstico, seguimiento y tratamiento de los pacientes. Finalmente, se contempla el papel de las familias y los aspectos psicosociales del programa, así como la evolución del movimiento asociativo, con especial mención a la fundación en 1990 de la Federación Española de PKU y otros trastornos (FAEPKU) (que pasó después a llamarse la Federación Española de Enfermedades Metabólicas Hereditarias) y en 1999 de la Federación Española de Enfermedades Raras (FEDER). Estas asociaciones han contribuido notablemente al empoderamiento de los pacientes, a apoyar la investigación y la formación y a establecer una red de colaboración y soporte para los pacientes y sus familias. Y aunque están en contacto y colaboran con las autoridades sanitarias, hasta el momento no han participado en la elaboración de decisiones y en la gobernanza de los programas. El espíritu de superación y mejora ha marcado la evolución de los programas durante este medio siglo al incluir el desarrollo de sus aspectos éticos, legales y sociales. Se avecinan desafíos tecnológicos importantes y habrá que saber utilizarlos con eficiencia, proporcionalidad y justicia en el mejor interés del niño y, por extensión, de la familia y de la sociedad.

Ethical questions concerning newborn genetic screening.

Newborn screening is a public health strategy used to identify certain diseases in the first days of life and, therefore, facilitate early treatment before the onset of symptoms. The decision of which diseases should be included in a screening goes beyond the medical perspective, including reasons for public health and health economics. There are a number of characteristics to include a disease in the screening, such as that the disorder must be a significant health problem, the natural history of the disease must be well known, a feasible and accurate test must be available, there must be a treatment that is most effective when applied before the onset of clinical symptoms and a health system must be in place that is capable of performing the procedure and subsequent monitoring. Currently, newborn screening programs are currently based on the use of biochemical markers that detect metabolites, hormones or proteins, but recently, the availability of new technology has allowed the possibility of a genetic screening. In addition to technical problems, the possibility of neonatal screening also presents a number of ethical problems. We identified and discussed six areas of particular concern: type of illness, overdiagnosis or overtreatment, information management and informed consent, data confidentiality and protection, justice and legal regulation.

Local deliberative approach to the bioethical controversies: An opportunity for the proper implementation of neonatal screening / [Enfoque local deliberativo de las controversias bioéticas: una oportunidad para la adecuada implementación de la tamización neonatal].

Introduction: The controversial characteristics of neonatal screening influenced by bioethical considerations make its implementation complex. Colombia is not an exception in this sense and local circumstances complicate the panorama. Objective: To establish how bioethical controversies on neonatal screening are approached at a local level as a basis for deliberating on the must-be of this activity in Colombia. Materials and methods: A survey immersed in an interpretative investigation with descriptive and deliberative components of analysis was applied to approach the values exposed by officials of the Colombian Instituto Nacional de Salud. Results: The compulsory offer of screening by the nation, regardless of its opportunity cost and the consent for the use in research of results and residual samples, were not controversial, but, in contrast, the type of information and the consent to authorize screening did arise controversy. The more experienced officials preferred mandatory screening (17.7 vs. 11.79 years on average, p=0.007). Surprisingly, despite the risk of discrimination, keeping the neonate as the purpose, there was agreement on giving all the information to parents and medical records. Another controversial aspect was the follow-up of cases without hiding their identification where officials with more experience in bioethical aspects preferred the use of codes (4.5 vs. 1.26 years on average, p=0.009). In this context, strategies such as informed dissent, specialized advice or public health programs that appreciate diversity would allow to rescue even seemingly opposite values. Conclusion: A local approach regarding what ought to be in neonatal screening based on a deliberative bioethical perspective allowed to present an implementation proposal for this activity

Introducción. Las características controversiales de la tamización neonatal influenciadas por consideraciones bioéticas hacen compleja su implementación. Colombia no es ajena a esta situación y las circunstancias locales complican el panorama. Objetivo. Determinar cómo se abordan en el contexto local las controversias bioéticas en torno a la tamización neonatal como fundamento de las deliberaciones sobre el deber ser de esta actividad en Colombia. Materiales y métodos. Se aplicó una encuesta en el marco de un estudio interpretativo con dos componentes de análisis, uno descriptivo y otro deliberativo, en torno a los valores expuestos por funcionarios del Instituto Nacional de Salud. Resultados. La oferta obligatoria de la tamización por parte de la nación, independientemente del costo de oportunidad y el consentimiento para el uso de sus resultados y de las muestras residuales en la investigación, no suscitaron controversias, pero sí el tipo de información y la autorización para hacer la tamización. Los funcionarios con mayor experiencia expresaron su preferencia por una tamización obligatoria (17,7 Vs. 11,79 años en promedio; p=0,007). Sorpresivamente, a pesar del riesgo de discriminación, teniendo como fin el neonato, hubo acuerdo en entregar toda la información a padres e historia clínica. Otro aspecto controversial fue la identificación de los pacientes en el seguimiento, frente a lo cual los funcionarios de mayor experiencia en aspectos bioéticos prefirieron el uso de códigos (4,5 Vs. 1,26 años en promedio; p=0,009). En este contexto, estrategias como el disentimiento informado, el asesoramiento especializado o los programas de salud pública que aprecien la diversidad permitirían rescatar valores, incluso aquellos aparentemente opuestos. Conclusión. La aproximación local al deber ser de la tamización neonatal desde una perspectiva bioética deliberativa permitió ajustar una propuesta para su implementación.

[Susceptibility genetics of common conditions in clinical practice]. / Des tests génétiques pour prédire des maladies communes.

The genetic tests for "non-rare thrombophilias" (TNR) were introduced into clinical setting immediately after the identification of genetic variants in the mid-90s to predict and prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although being a rare example of a genetic test of susceptibility for complex diseases that has been integrated in medical routine, it is the most widespread post-natal genetics inquiry in France nowadays. Yet, determining whom to test and how to use the results is still controversial. This article outlines the trajectory of its clinical regulation and illustrates the importance of the context of use to understand its diffusion. This analysis is intended to feed a more general reflection on the issues raised by the clinical integration of genetic surveys for common diseases, particularly with regard to the clinical utility of a test (statistical vs. biological), the subjects to be tested (the case index and/or her/his relatives), and the criteria underlying access to these tests (modalities of medico-economic assessment).

TITLE: Des tests génétiques pour prédire des maladies communes. ABSTRACT: Introduit au lendemain de l'identification des « thrombophilies non rares ¼ (TNR), au milieu des années 1990 afin de prédire et de prévenir la maladie thromboembolique veineuse (MTEV), le bilan génétique pour ces thrombophilies est un exemple assez rare de test génétique de susceptibilité pour une maladie complexe, à avoir franchi le pas d'un véritable usage de routine en clinique. Bien que ce test soit le plus répandu des tests de génétique post-natale en France, son usage (À qui proposer le test ? Que faire des résultats ?) fait encore l'objet de débats. Cet article analyse la trajectoire de régulation clinique de ce test et illustre l'importance du contexte spécifique d'usage pour comprendre sa diffusion. Cette analyse vise à nourrir une réflexion plus générale sur les enjeux que pose l'intégration clinique des tests génétiques pour les maladies communes, en considérant notamment les modalités de définition de l'utilité clinique d'un test (statistique versus biologique), des sujets du test (le cas index versus ses apparentés), et des critères en sous-tendant l'accès (modalités des calculs médico-économiques).

Ethical Issues in Newborn Sequencing Research: The Case Study of BabySeq.

The BabySeq Project is a study funded by the National Institutes of Health and aimed at exploring the medical, behavioral, and economic impacts of integrating genomic sequencing into the care of both healthy newborns and newborns who are sick. Infants were randomly assigned to receive standard of care or standard of care plus sequencing. The protocol and consent specified that only childhood-onset conditions would be returned. When 1 child was found to carry a BRCA2 mutation despite a negative family history, the research team experienced moral distress about nondisclosure and sought institutional review board permission to disclose. The protocol was then modified to require participants to agree to receive results for adult-onset-only conditions as a precondition to study enrollment. The BabySeq team asserted that their new protocol was in the child's best interest because having one's parents alive and well provides both an individual child benefit and a "family benefit." We begin with a short description of BabySeq and the controversy regarding predictive genetic testing of children for adult-onset conditions. We then examine the ethical problems with (1) the revised BabySeq protocol and (2) the concept of family benefit as a justification for the return of adult-onset-only conditions. We reject family benefit as a moral reason to expand genomic sequencing of children beyond conditions that present in childhood. We also argue that researchers should design their pediatric studies to avoid, when possible, identifying adult-onset-only genetic variants and that parents should not be offered the return of this information if discovered unless relevant for the child's current or imminent health.

Ethical issues with testing and treatment for Krabbe disease.

Early-infantile Krabbe disease (EIKD) is an autosomal recessive, progressive, neurodegenerative disorder that usually leads to death in infancy. A study published in 2005 indicated that hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) was effective in the treatment for EIKD when used before the onset of symptoms. This finding suggested that newborn screening for EIKD, which would allow earlier diagnosis, might lead to earlier treatment and better outcomes. In 2006, New York was the first state to implement newborn screening for Krabbe disease; however, the results were not as good as proponents had hoped. In this paper, we present the history of efforts to diagnose and treat EIKD. Based on our findings, we question the efficacy of newborn screening for Krabbe disease. We present two arguments. First, testing itself is too imprecise. Even with the most rigorous testing standards, such as those used in New York, many of the children who are identified as being 'at risk' for EIKD remain asymptomatic. It is unclear if they will remain asymptomatic forever and, thus, whether the tests should be considered 'false positives', or whether they will eventually develop the disease. Second, we question the efficacy of early HSCT. We recommend placing a moratorium on mandatory newborn screening for EIKD. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Current tests to identify which children are likely to develop Krabbe diseased are inadequate. Many children identified as being 'at risk' for early infantile Krabbe disease remain asymptomatic. Psychosine appears to be more specific than low galactosylceramidase levels for diagnosing early infantile Krabbe disease.

Bioethics and public policies in neonatal screening in the United States, United Kingdom, and Colombia / Bioética y políticas públicas de tamización neonatal en los Estados Unidos, el Reino Unido y Colombia

Introduction: Thinking about how neonatal screening should be done requires explaining the relevance of the bioethical factors involved. Objective: To understand the relationship between bioethical considerations and the way neonatal screening is done and to identify its relevance in the Colombian legislation. Materials and methods: A comparative study of public policies in the United States and the United Kingdom was done, as they exemplify extreme cases of neonatal screening. The influence of bioethical principles was interpreted based on similarities and differences. With this information, locally affected bioethical considerations were identified in the Colombian legislation on neonatal screening. Results: In the United Kingdom, paternal autonomy prevails allowing parents to deny obligatory beneficence. In the USA, beneficence prevails and a significant number of anomalies must be screened for. This increases the likelihood of false positives and causes a high opportunity cost. Both countries have similarities which are also partially accepted in Colombia, such as the demand for equity of access. Others, such as specialized professional advice or the right to refuse screening, are not considered in the Colombian legislation on neonatal screening. Additionally, there are circumstances in Colombia such as different perspectives on what respecting justice means and how to apply that in choosing which abnormalities are screened for and lack of harmony between norms that prevents efficacious detection. Conclusion: Bioethical considerations explain the differences between countries and sometimes prevail in the development of public policies on neonatal screening. Their inclusion in high-level norms in Colombia for effective screening is proposed.

Introducción. La reflexión sobre cómo deber ser la tamización neonatal requiere revelar la relevancia de los factores bioéticos involucrados. Objetivo. Comprender la relación de las consideraciones bioéticas con la forma en que se efectúa la tamización neonatal e indicar la relevancia de esta actividad en las normas colombianas. Materiales y métodos. Se hizo un estudio comparado de las políticas públicas en Estados Unidos y el Reino Unido, las cuales representan casos extremos de la tamización neonatal. Con base en las similitudes y las diferencias, se interpretó la influencia de los principios bioéticos. Con esta información, se indicaron en la normatividad colombiana sobre tamización neonatal las consideraciones bioéticas pertinentes. Resultados. En el Reino Unido prevalece la autonomía de los padres, lo que ocasiona riesgos al no cumplirse con las acciones obligatorias de beneficencia. En los Estados Unidos prevalece la beneficencia, con un amplio y obligatorio cubrimiento de anomalías sujetas a tamización, lo cual incrementa la probabilidad de falsos positivos y ocasiona un alto costo de oportunidad. Hay similitudes entre los procedimientos de los dos países que también están parcialmente contemplados en Colombia, como la pretensión de equidad en el acceso. Otras, como el asesoramiento profesional especializado o la posibilidad de rechazar la tamización, no se tienen en cuenta en la normatividad colombiana sobre tamización neonatal. Además, hay diferentes enfoques de justicia frente a la inclusión de las anomalías en la tamización y falta de armonía entre las normas, lo que impide una detección eficaz. Conclusión. Las consideraciones bioéticas no solo explican las diferencias entre países, sino que algunas veces prevalecen en la concepción de las políticas públicas de tamización neonatal. En Colombia, se propone su inclusión en las normas de mayor jerarquía para hacerlas más efectivas.

Newborn screening for SMA in Southern Belgium.

Approval was recently granted for a new treatment for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Given that the treatment is effective when administered early and the societal burden of SMA-related disability, the implementation of a newborn screening program is warranted. We describe the stepwise process that led us to launch a newborn screening program for SMA in Southern Belgium. Different political, ethical, and clinical partners were informed about this project and were involved in its governance, as were genetic and screening labs. We developed and validated a newborn screening method to specifically recognize homozygous deletions of exon 7 in the SMN1 gene. Subsequently, a 3-year pilot study has been recently initiated in one Belgian neonatal screening laboratory to cover 17.000 neonates per year. Coverage extension to all of Southern Belgium to screen 55.000 babies each year is underway.

The Current State of Newborn Screening in the United States.

Newborn screening has evolved since its introduction in 1963. The disorders that are being screened for continue to evolve as new treatments and new technologies advance. In this review, the authors discuss the current state of newborn screening in the United States, including the disorders currently being screened for and how newborn screening is performed. They also discuss the special considerations and limitations of newborn screening in sick and premature infants and as well as some ethical issues related to newborn screening. Finally, new disorders being considered for testing and new technologies that may be used in the future of newborn screening are discussed.

Bioética y políticas públicas de tamización neonatal en los Estados Unidos, el Reino Unido y Colombia / Bioethics and public policies in neonatal screening in the United States, United Kingdom, and Colombia

Resumen Introducción. La reflexiónsobre cómo deber ser la tamización neonatal requiere revelar la relevancia de los factores bioéticos involucrados. Objetivo. Comprender la relación de las consideraciones bioéticas con la forma en que se efectúa la tamización neonatal e indicar la relevancia de esta actividad en las normas colombianas. Materiales y métodos. Se hizo un estudio comparado de las políticas públicas en Estados Unidos y el Reino Unido, las cuales representan casos extremos de la tamización neonatal. Con base en las similitudes y las diferencias, se interpretó la influencia de los principios bioéticos. Con esta información, se indicaron en la normatividad colombiana sobre tamización neonatal las consideraciones bioéticas pertinentes. Resultados. En el Reino Unido prevalece la autonomía de los padres, lo que ocasiona riesgos al no cumplirse con las acciones obligatorias de beneficencia. En los Estados Unidos prevalece la beneficencia, con un amplio y obligatorio cubrimiento de anomalías sujetas a tamización, lo cual incrementa la probabilidad de falsos positivos y ocasiona un alto costo de oportunidad. Hay similitudes entre los procedimientos de los dos países que también están parcialmente contemplados en Colombia, como la pretensión de equidad en el acceso. Otras, como el asesoramiento profesional especializado o la posibilidad de rechazar la tamización, no se tienen en cuenta en la normatividad colombiana sobre tamización neonatal. Además, hay diferentes enfoques de justicia frente a la inclusión de las anomalías en la tamización y falta de armonía entre las normas, lo que impide una detección eficaz. Conclusión. Las consideraciones bioéticas no solo explican las diferencias entre países, sino que algunas veces prevalecen en la concepción de las políticas públicas de tamización neonatal. En Colombia, se propone su inclusión en las normas de mayor jerarquía para hacerlas más efectivas.

Abstract Introduction: Thinking about how neonatal screening should be done requires explaining the relevance of the bioethical factors involved. Objective: To understand the relationship between bioethical considerations and the way neonatal screening is done and to identify its relevance in the Colombian legislation. Materials and methods: A comparative study of public policies in the United States and the United Kingdom was done, as they exemplify extreme cases of neonatal screening. The influence of bioethical principles was interpreted based on similarities and differences. With this information, locally affected bioethical considerations were identified in the Colombian legislation on neonatal screening. Results: In the United Kingdom, paternal autonomy prevails allowing parents to deny obligatory beneficence. In the USA, beneficence prevails and a significant number of anomalies must be screened for. This increases the likelihood of false positives and causes a high opportunity cost. Both countries have similarities which are also partially accepted in Colombia, suchas the demand for equity of access. Others, suchas specialized professional advice or the right to refuse screening, are not considered in the Colombian legislation on neonatal screening. Additionally, there are circumstances in Colombia such as different perspectives on what respecting justice means and how to apply that in choosing which abnormalities are screened for and lack of harmony between norms that prevents efficacious detection. Conclusion: Bioethical considerations explain the differences between countries and sometimes prevail in the development of public policies on neonatal screening. Their inclusion in high-level norms in Colombia for effective screening is proposed.

Ethical and Psychosocial Issues in Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) for Newborns.

In this article, I review some of the ethical issues that have arisen in the past when genetic testing has been done in newborns. I then suggest how whole genome sequencing may raise a new set of issues. Finally, I introduce a series of other articles in which the authors address different controversies that arise when whole genome sequencing is used in the newborn period.

Parental interest in genomic sequencing of newborns: enrollment experience from the BabySeq Project.

PURPOSE: Newborn genomic sequencing (nGS) has great potential to improve pediatric care. Parental interest and concerns about genomics are relatively unexplored. Understanding why parents decline research consent for nGS may reveal implementation barriers. METHODS: We evaluated parental interest in a randomized trial of nGS in well-baby and intensive care unit nursery settings. Interested families attended an informational enrollment session (ES) with a genetic counselor prior to consenting. Reason(s) for declining participation and sociodemographic associations were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 3860 eligible approached families, 10% attended ES, 67% of whom enrolled. Of 1760 families queried for decline reasons, 58% were uninterested in research. Among 499 families considering research, principal reasons for decline prior to ES included burdensome study logistics (48%), feeling overwhelmed postpartum (17%), and lack of interest/discomfort with genetic testing (17%). Decliners after ES more often cited concerns about privacy/insurability (41%) and uncertain/unfavorable results (23%). CONCLUSION: Low interest in research and study logistics were major initial barriers to postpartum enrollment and are likely generic to many postpartum research efforts. Concerns over privacy and result implications were most commonly cited in decliners after ES. Understanding parental concerns around research nGS may inform future integration of nGS into newborn screening, predictive testing, and pediatric diagnostics.

Including ELSI research questions in newborn screening pilot studies.

BACKGROUND: The evidence review processes for adding new conditions to state newborn screening (NBS) panels rely on data from pilot studies aimed at assessing the potential benefits and harms of screening. However, the consideration of ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of screening within this research has been limited. This paper outlines important ELSI issues related to newborn screening policy and practices as a resource to help researchers integrate ELSI into NBS pilot studies. APPROACH: Members of the Bioethics and Legal Workgroup for the Newborn Screening Translational Research Network facilitated a series of professional and public discussions aimed at engaging NBS stakeholders to identify important existing and emerging ELSI challenges accompanying NBS. RESULTS: Through these engagement activities, we identified a set of key ELSI questions related to (1) the types of results parents may receive through newborn screening and (2) the initiation and implementation of NBS for a condition within the NBS system. CONCLUSION: Integrating ELSI questions into pilot studies will help NBS programs to better understand the potential impact of screening for a new condition on newborns and families, and make crucial policy decisions aimed at maximized benefits and mitigating the potential negative medical or social implications of screening.

What Genomic Sequencing Can Offer Universal Newborn Screening Programs.

Massively parallel sequencing, also known as next-generation sequencing, has the potential to significantly improve newborn screening programs in the United States and around the world. Compared to genetic tests whose use is well established, sequencing allows for the analysis of large amounts of DNA, providing more comprehensive and rapid results at a lower cost. It is already being used in limited ways by some public health newborn screening laboratories in the United States and other countries-and it is under study for broader and more widespread use, including as a core part of newborn screening programs. Sequencing technology has the potential to significantly improve these essential public health programs. For many of the conditions that newborns are already screened for, sequencing can return more specific and more sensitive results. The technology could also enable newborn screening programs to expand the list of rare pediatric conditions that they look for, thereby identifying more infants who can benefit from immediate care.

Families' Experiences with Newborn Screening: A Critical Source of Evidence.

Debates about expanding newborn screening with whole genome sequencing are fueled by data about public perception, public opinion, and the positions taken by public advocates and advocacy groups. One form of evidence that merits attention as we consider possible uses of whole-genome sequencing during the newborn period is parents' (and children's) diverse experiences with existing expanded screening protocols. What do we know about this experience base? And what implications might these data have for decisions about how we use whole genome sequencing and how we assess its impact in the future? Although the broader literature on genetic susceptibility testing suggests that testing usually does not have adverse effects on children's psychosocial well-being, certain newborn screening results have been demonstrated to cause distress, alter behavior, and even to influence the formation of new parental and family identities.